Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | rubyxillia | 7-1 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | claudio giudici | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Mono Black Demons , Orzhov Midrange , Orzhov Pixie
Meta Performance Analysis
Soul Shatter ranks #2812 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 55%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Soul Shatter is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 5.73 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Soul Shatter has a win rate of 57.3%, making it 20.7% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hagra Mauling | Instant | 5 | 64.2% | 2 |
| Shadows' Verdict | Sorcery | 6 | 55.6% | 1 |
| Blood on the Snow | Snow Sorcery | 7 | 50.0% | 1 |
| Poison the Cup | Instant | 5 | 48.9% | 1 |
| Saw It Coming | Instant | 6 | 48.4% | 2 |
| Iymrith, Desert Doom | Legendary Creature — Dragon | 5 | 47.5% | 2 |
| Jwari Disruption | Instant | 6 | 46.3% | 1 |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 8 | 45.5% | 2 |
| Replicating Ring | Snow Artifact | 6 | 43.7% | 1 |
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 6 | 42.6% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Soul Shatter than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extinction Event | Sorcery | 4 | 5 | 78.4% | 59.1% | +19.3% |
| Hagra Mauling | Instant | 4 | 7 | 80.0% | 63.1% | +16.9% |
| Saw It Coming | Instant | 3 | 6 | 75.0% | 58.3% | +16.7% |
| Eliminate | Instant | 2 | 5 | 75.7% | 60.9% | +14.8% |
| Poison the Cup | Instant | 3 | 5 | 80.0% | 67.3% | +12.7% |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 71.9% | 60.1% | +11.8% |
| Deadly Dispute | Instant | 2 | 5 | 69.2% | 58.1% | +11.1% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 7 | 66.7% | 56.9% | +9.8% |
| Blood on the Snow | Snow Sorcery | 6 | 7 | 72.4% | 62.8% | +9.6% |
| Heartless Act | Instant | 2 | 6 | 67.6% | 58.6% | +9.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 9 | 0.4% | 37.8% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 4 | 1.6% | 28.1% |
| Esper Pixie | 3 | 0.2% | 41.7% |
| Dimir Control | 2 | 2.2% | 59.8% |
| Mono Black Demons | 2 | 1.1% | 40.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.